Premium
Rain forest nutrient cycling and productivity in response to large‐scale litter manipulation
Author(s) -
Wood Tana E.,
Lawrence Deborah,
Clark Deborah A.,
Chazdon Robin L.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.144
H-Index - 294
eISSN - 1939-9170
pISSN - 0012-9658
DOI - 10.1890/07-1146.1
Subject(s) - litter , nutrient , plant litter , cycling , nutrient cycle , environmental science , productivity , soil fertility , ecosystem , ecology , agronomy , forest floor , tropics , basal area , biology , forestry , soil water , geography , macroeconomics , economics
Litter‐induced pulses of nutrient availability could play an important role in the productivity and nutrient cycling of forested ecosystems, especially tropical forests. Tropical forests experience such pulses as a result of wet–dry seasonality and during major climatic events, such as strong El Niños. We hypothesized that (1) an increase in the quantity and quality of litter inputs would stimulate leaf litter production, woody growth, and leaf litter nutrient cycling, and (2) the timing and magnitude of this response would be influenced by soil fertility and forest age. To test these hypotheses in a Costa Rican wet tropical forest, we established a large‐scale litter manipulation experiment in two secondary forest sites and four old‐growth forest sites of differing soil fertility. In replicated plots at each site, leaves and twigs (<2 cm diameter) were removed from a 400‐m 2 area and added to an adjacent 100‐m 2 area. This transfer was the equivalent of adding 5–25 kg/ha of organic P to the forest floor. We analyzed leaf litter mass, [N] and [P], and N and P inputs for addition, removal, and control plots over a two‐year period. We also evaluated basal area increment of trees in removal and addition plots. There was no response of forest productivity or nutrient cycling to litter removal; however, litter addition significantly increased leaf litter production and N and P inputs 4–5 months following litter application. Litter production increased as much as 92%, and P and N inputs as much as 85% and 156%, respectively. In contrast, litter manipulation had no significant effect on woody growth. The increase in leaf litter production and N and P inputs were significantly positively related to the total P that was applied in litter form. Neither litter treatment nor forest type influenced the temporal pattern of any of the variables measured. Thus, environmental factors such as rainfall drive temporal variability in litter and nutrient inputs, while nutrient release from decomposing litter influences the magnitude. Seasonal or annual variation in leaf litter mass, such as occurs in strong El Niño events, could positively affect leaf litter nutrient cycling and forest productivity, indicating an ability of tropical trees to rapidly respond to increased nutrient availability.