Premium
SEASONAL REASSEMBLY OF A RIVER FOOD WEB: FLOODS, DROUGHTS, AND IMPACTS OF FISH
Author(s) -
Power Mary E.,
Parker Michael S.,
Dietrich William E.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
ecological monographs
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.254
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1557-7015
pISSN - 0012-9615
DOI - 10.1890/06-0902.1
Subject(s) - cladophora , biomass (ecology) , ecology , algae , environmental science , periphyton , biology , flood myth , fishery , geography , archaeology
Eighteen years of field observations and five summer field experiments in a coastal California river suggest that hydrologic regimes influence algal blooms and the impacts of fish on algae, cyanobacteria, invertebrates, and small vertebrates. In this Mediterranean climate, rainy winters precede the biologically active summer low‐flow season. Cladophora glomerata , the filamentous green alga that dominates primary producer biomass during summer, reaches peak biomass during late spring or early summer. Cladophora blooms are larger if floods during the preceding winter attained or exceeded “bankfull discharge” (sufficient to mobilize much of the river bed, estimated at 120 m 3 /s). In 9 out of 12 summers preceded by large bed‐scouring floods, the average peak height of attached Cladophora turfs equaled or exceeded 50 cm. In five out of six years when flows remained below bankfull, Cladophora biomass peaked at lower levels. Flood effects on algae were partially mediated through impacts on consumers in food webs. In three experiments that followed scouring winter floods, juvenile steelhead ( Oncorhynchus mykiss ) and roach ( Lavinia ( Hesperoleucas ) symmetricus ) suppressed certain insects and young‐of‐the‐year fish fry, affecting persistence or accrual of algae positively or negatively, depending on the predator‐specific vulnerabilities of primary consumers capable of suppressing algae during a given year. During two post‐flood years, these grazers were more vulnerable to small predators (odonates and fish fry, which stocked steelhead always suppressed) than to experimentally manipulated, larger fish, which had adverse effects on algae in those years. During one post‐flood year, all enclosed grazers capable of suppressing algae were consumed by steelhead, which therefore had positive effects on algae. During drought years, when no bed‐scouring winter flows occurred, large armored caddisflies ( Dicosmoecus gilvipes ) were more abundant during the subsequent summer. In drought‐year experiments, stocked fish had little or no influence on algal standing crops, which increased only when Dicosmoecus were removed from enclosures. Flood scour, by suppressing invulnerable grazers, set the stage for fish mediated effects on algae in this river food web. Whether these effects were positive or negative depended on the predator‐specific vulnerabilities of primary consumers that dominated during a given summer.