PREDATOR‐ AND COMPETITOR‐INDUCED PLASTICITY: HOW CHANGES IN FORAGING MORPHOLOGY AFFECT PHENOTYPIC TRADE‐OFFS

Studies of phenotypic plasticity frequently demonstrate functional trade‐offs between alternative phenotypes by documenting environment‐specific costs and benefits. However, the functional mechanisms underlying these trade‐offs are often unknown. For example, predator‐induced traits typically provide superior predator resistance but slower growth, while competitor‐induced traits provide better growth but inferior predator resistance. While the mechanisms underlying predator resistance have been identified, the mechanisms underlying differential growth have remained elusive. To determine whether competitor and predator environments affect individual growth by induced changes in foraging morphology, we raised wood frog tadpoles ( Rana sylvatica ) under a factorial combination of competitors and predators and assessed changes in mouthparts that might affect growth. In general, competitors induced relatively larger oral discs, wider beaks, and longer tooth rows, while predators induced relatively smaller oral discs, narrower beaks, and shorter tooth rows. These effects were interactive; the largest competitor‐induced responses occurred under high predator density and the largest predator‐induced responses occurred under low competition. Further, one of the tooth rows that commonly appeared under low predation risk was frequently absent under high predation risk. These discoveries suggest that predator and competitor environments can have profound effects on prey foraging structures and that these effects set up growth trade‐offs between phenotypes that favor the evolution of phenotypically plastic responses.