EFFECTS OF DISTURBANCE, LIFE HISTORIES, AND OVERGROWTH ON COEXISTENCE OF ALGAL CRUSTS AND TURFS

Coexistence of species is generally attributed to the interacting roles of competition, predation, and disturbance. Overgrowth is considered to be an important mechanism of competition for space, and species are often ranked in hierarchies based on their abilities to overgrow. In some marine habitats, however, encrusting algae dominate primary substrata despite a dense permanent cover of epiphytes, suggesting that factors other than competition could be important in influencing their distributions. The spatial relationships and competitive interactions between encrusting algae and overgrowing filamentous, turf‐forming algae were investigated on a subtidal rocky reef (Mediterranean Sea, Italy). Quantitative observations and field experiments were done from 1992 to 1998: (1) to investigate the relative patterns of distribution and abundance of crusts and turf and how they differed across space and time, (2) to test whether spatial relationships between crusts and turf were influenced by various characteristics of the substratum and by disturbance from wave action, (3) to investigate spatial and temporal patterns of recruitment and the mechanisms by which crusts colonize space, and (4) to test whether crusts and turf compete for space. Crusts were always among the first colonizers of available bare rock and were subsequently overgrown by turf. Despite variations in spatial and temporal recruitment of crusts, this pattern was never reversed. Covers of crusts and turf were not significantly affected by disturbance. There was some evidence for competition, but this did not result in the local exclusion of either crusts or turf. Despite extensive and persistent cover of turf, encrusting algae were abundant and were able to live, grow, and reproduce beneath the turf over long periods with little adverse effect. Similarly, crusts did not limit the distribution of turf, although they slowed its rate of growth. The capabilities of turf and crusts to overgrow and tolerate overgrowth, respectively, were identified as the major determinants of the structure of this two‐layered assemblage and the probable basis of the success of these species in coexisting as the dominant algal forms. Overgrowth was not equivalent to competitive subordination and displacement, emphasizing the need for caution when interpreting competitive abilities from observed patterns of overgrowth. Overall, results suggested that, in some habitats, tolerance may be more important than competition in maintaining coexistence of species and influencing community structure.