Premium
MECHANISMS AND DENSITY DEPENDENCE OF BENEFIT IN AN ANT–MEMBRACID MUTUALISM
Author(s) -
Morales Manuel A.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.144
H-Index - 294
eISSN - 1939-9170
pISSN - 0012-9658
DOI - 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[0482:maddob]2.0.co;2
Subject(s) - mutualism (biology) , predation , ecology , myrmecophyte , honeydew , biology , predator , ant , ecosystem , myrmecophily , nectar , pollen
I examined mechanisms and patterns of benefit for the membracid (treehopper) Publilia concava tended by the ant Formica obscuriventris to test two hypotheses: that treehoppers benefit from ant attendance only by protection from predators, and that density‐dependent benefit depends on the presence of predators. I used a factorial design, manipulating ants and predators in 1996, and ants and removal of uncollected honeydew in 1997. Results showed that treehoppers benefit from ant attendance by protection from predators. Additionally, results suggested that treehoppers benefit from ant attendance in ways other than protection from predators; tended treehoppers outperform untended treehoppers even with predators excluded. There was no support for the hypothesis that a proximate benefit of ant‐tending includes removal of uncollected honeydew. A possible benefit (untested) of ant‐tending is increased feeding rates. Treehoppers in small aggregations benefited more than treehoppers in large aggregations, indicating a density‐dependent benefit in this mutualism, independent of predator level. Correspondingly, the number of ants per treehopper was highest for small aggregations. This study suggests that individuals can benefit from mutualisms in complex ways. Additionally, it adds to a growing number of studies that support the hypotheses that mutualisms may be stabilized by density‐dependent benefit and that density‐dependent benefit may be driven by the recruitment patterns of mutualists.