Premium
Cross‐talk acceptability in natural still images for different (auto)stereoscopic display technologies
Author(s) -
Wang Lili,
Tu Yan,
Chen Li,
Zhang Panpan,
Teunissen Kees,
Heynderickx Ingrid
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
journal of the society for information display
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.578
H-Index - 52
eISSN - 1938-3657
pISSN - 1071-0922
DOI - 10.1889/jsid18.6.405
Subject(s) - stereoscopy , luminance , computer science , distortion (music) , computer vision , contrast (vision) , artificial intelligence , display device , image quality , perception , computer graphics (images) , image (mathematics) , psychology , telecommunications , amplifier , bandwidth (computing) , neuroscience , operating system
— One of the most annoying distortions in (auto)stereoscopic displays is probably cross‐talk, visible as double edges, which is mainly caused by an imperfect separation of left‐ and right‐eye images. For different types of three‐dimensional (3‐D) displays, cross‐talk is caused by different origins, which could result in different levels of perceived image distortion. To evaluate the influence of (auto)stereoscopic display technology on cross‐talk perception, optical measurements and subjective assessments were performed with three different types of 3‐D displays. It is shown with natural still images that the 3‐D display technology with the lowest luminance and contrast level tolerates the highest level of cross‐talk, while still maintaining an acceptable image‐quality level.