Premium
Use of self‐erase discharges for high‐speed and low‐voltage addressing of PDPs
Author(s) -
Shimura Masakazu,
Yamaguchi Tsuyoshi,
Shiga Tomokazu,
Mikoshiba Shigeo
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
journal of the society for information display
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.578
H-Index - 52
eISSN - 1938-3657
pISSN - 1071-0922
DOI - 10.1889/jsid16.12.1213
Subject(s) - luminance , low voltage , voltage , reset (finance) , high voltage , materials science , computer science , optoelectronics , pulse (music) , physics , threshold voltage , electrical engineering , optics , transistor , quantum mechanics , financial economics , economics , engineering
— A technique called “self‐erase‐discharge addressing” has been incorporated with a address‐while‐display driving scheme, contiguous subfield, and erase addressing to obtain high‐speed and low‐voltage addressing of PDPs. The technique uses a relatively high X‐sustain pulse voltage VXsus , which produces a weak self‐erase discharge at its trailing edge. An application of a data pulse Vdata synchronous to a weak self‐erase discharge results in full erase discharge and eliminates all the wall charges. The technique assures a wider operating‐voltage margin since it provides identical amounts of priming charges as well as wall charges to all the horizontal scan lines just prior to addressing. The priming charges are generated by the weak self‐erase discharges, resulting in low Vdata of 30 V and a high addressing speed of 0.66 μsec for a Ne + 10% Xe PDP. V Xsus = 245 V, and the voltage margins of Vdata and VXsus were 35 and 16 V, respectively. For a 30% Xe PDP, Vdata and VXsus were 30 and 335 V, respectively, with an addressing speed of 1.0 μsec. In order to obtain high dark‐room contrast, it is essential to use ramp reset pulses, with which erase addressing cannot be achieved. By adopting the write addressing only to the first subfield and the self‐erase‐discharge addressing to the subsequent subfields, a peak and background luminance in green of 3100 and 0.22 cd/m 2 , respectively, were obtained with a dark‐room contrast of 14,000:1. The number of subfields was 28, and the light emission duty was 83%. The number of ramp reset pulse drivers could be reduced to 12 by adopting the common reset pulse technique.