Premium
14.1: Resolution Artefacts in Multi‐View Autostereoscopic 2D/3D Displays
Author(s) -
Woodgate Graham J.,
Harrold Jonathan
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
sid symposium digest of technical papers
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.351
H-Index - 44
eISSN - 2168-0159
pISSN - 0097-966X
DOI - 10.1889/1.2433386
Subject(s) - autostereoscopy , video graphics array , pixel , computer science , display device , display resolution , stereo display , computer graphics (images) , artificial intelligence , computer vision , stereoscopy , eyewear , holographic display , viewing angle , image resolution , display size , resolution (logic) , stereophonic sound , holography , liquid crystal display , optics , computer hardware , physics , telecommunications , channel (broadcasting) , field programmable gate array , operating system
Autostereoscopic displays suitable for the mass market typically rely on spatial multiplexing to present different views in different directions. To obtain the wide viewing freedom often requested by display users, the number of views presented is increased by the sacrifice of display resolution. In order to compare such multi‐view displays, both quantitative and qualitative comparisons have been made of resolution losses and pixel appearance. Specifically, 2.2″ 2D/3D panel performance has been assessed using Nyquist boundaries, human visual contrast sensitivity models and autostereoscopic display optical output simulations. A strong candidate for an optimum compromise between display brightness, viewing angle and 3D pixel appearance is a 4‐view vertical Polarisation Activated Microlens technology with either QVGA mosaic or VGA stripe pixel arrangements.