Premium
Protective layer for high‐efficiency PDPs driven at low voltage
Author(s) -
Motoyama Yasushi,
Kurauchi Toshiharu
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
journal of the society for information display
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.578
H-Index - 52
eISSN - 1938-3657
pISSN - 1071-0922
DOI - 10.1889/1.2206114
Subject(s) - layer (electronics) , materials science , voltage , ion , capacitance , electron , plasma display , optoelectronics , atomic physics , electrical engineering , chemistry , nanotechnology , physics , electrode , organic chemistry , quantum mechanics , engineering
— The sustain pulse voltage of a panel for 66‐kPa Ne + Xe (5–30%) with an (SrCa)O protective layer is 20–40% lower than that with an MgO protective layer. The luminous efficiency of the panel with a Ne + Xe (30%) (SrCa)O protective layer is 1.5 times that of the conventional panel with a Ne + Xe (10%) MgO protective layer; the sustain pulse voltages of these panels are almost the same. The power loss caused by panel capacitance is proportional to the second power of the sustain pulse voltage. Using the (SrCa)O protective layer for Xe (5–30%), the power loss is reduced by 35–60% compared with the MgO protective layer. It follows that, using the (SrCa)O protective layer, we can increase the Xe content with little power loss and thus achieve high‐efficiency PDPs. As for MgO and CaO with Xe ions, electrons are probably ejected from only the defect states. On the other hand, as for the SrO with Xe ions, it is likely that electrons can be ejected from not only defect states but also the valance band. This seems to be the reason why the driving voltage is lower with the (SrCa)O protective layer than with the MgO protective layer.