z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Association Between NRMN STAR Grantsmanship Self-Efficacy and Grant Submission
Author(s) -
Harlan P. Jones,
Jamboor K. Vishwanatha,
Edward L. Krug,
Eileen M. Harwood,
Kristin Eide Boman,
Thad Unold,
Roland J. Thorpe
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
ethnicity and disease
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1945-0826
pISSN - 1049-510X
DOI - 10.18865/ed.31.4.559
Subject(s) - grantsmanship , grant writing , family medicine , psychology , medical education , grant funding , medicine , political science , library science , higher education , computer science , law
Background: Eliminating the NIH fund­ing gap among underrepresented minori­ties (URMs) remains a high priority for the National Institutes of Health. In 2014, the National Research Mentoring Network1 Steps Toward Academic Research (NRMN STAR) program recruited postdoctoral, early-stage and junior faculty to participate in a 12-month grant writing and professional development program. The expectation of the program was to increase the number of grant submissions and awards to URM re­searchers. Although receiving a grant award is the gold standard of NRMN STAR, instill­ing confidence for postdocs and early-stage faculty to submit an application is a critical first step. Based on our previous study, a sustained increase in trainee self-efficacy score over a 24-month period was observed after completing NRMN STAR.Methods: The current study sought to determine the association between self-efficacy score and grant submissions among two cohorts of trainees. Grantsmanship Self-Efficacy was measured using a 19-item questionnaire previously described by and used in our own work, which was originally adapted from an 88-item Clinical Research Appraisal Inventory.2 A binary variable was created to identify trainees who submit­ted an initial or revised proposal vs those who abandoned their proposal or were still writing. Trainees were assessed prior to and following program completion with subsequent assessments at 6 and 12 months beyond participation.Results: As of June 20, 2019, 12 of the 21 (57%) trainees had submitted a grant proposal (eg, NIH, other federal or non-federal grant). For every point increase in 12-month post assessments, Grantsmanship Self-Efficacy scores across all domains had a 44% higher prevalence of submitting a grant after controlling for race, sex, education  level, academic rank, research experience, duration of postdoctoral training, institution type, and NRMN STAR cohort.  Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that NRMN STAR had a positive impact on trainees’ confidence in grant writing and professional development activities, which resulted in higher grant submis­sion rates.Ethn Dis. 2021;31(4):559-566; doi:10.18865/ed.31.4.559

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here