Open AccessCommunity Engagement and Planning versus Resources for Services for Implementing Depression Quality Improvement: Exploratory Analysis for Black and Latino Adults
Author(s) -
Nicolás E. Barceló,
A. López,
Lingqi Tang,
Maria Gabriela Aguilera Nunez,
Felica Jones,
Jeanne Miranda,
Bowen Chung,
Armen C. Arevian,
Curley Bonds,
Adriana Izquierdo,
Elizabeth Dixon,
Kenneth B. Wells
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
ethnicity and disease
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.767
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1945-0826
pISSN - 1049-510X
DOI - 10.18865/ed.29.2.277
Subject(s) - mental health , psychological intervention , depression (economics) , medicine , patient health questionnaire , ethnic group , gerontology , population , baseline (sea) , odds , odds ratio , intervention (counseling) , demography , logistic regression , environmental health , psychiatry , depressive symptoms , anxiety , sociology , anthropology , economics , macroeconomics , oceanography , pathology , geology
Objective: Racial/ethnic minorities experience disparities in depression1 and there is a paucity of evidence-based interventions to improve depression care access and outcomes. Community Partners in Care (CPIC) is a community-partnered study of depression care quality improvement (QI) in under-resourced, urban communities: Community Engagement and Planning (CEP) for multi-sector coalitions, and Resources for Services (RS) for program technical assistance.2 CEP demonstrated benefits for the overall CPIC study population; effects for Black and Latino sub-populations are unknown.Methods: This sub-analysis examines outcomes for 409 Latino and 488 Black (non-Latino) adults recruited from 90 programs who completed baseline or 6-month follow-up. Regression analyses were used to estimate CEP vs RS intervention effects on primary (Mental Health Related Quality of Life [MHRQL], Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9]) and community-prioritized (mental wellness, physical activity, risk for homelessness) outcomes at 6-months.Results: Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly by intervention in either group. In the adjusted analysis for Black adults, CEP resulted in decreased odds of poor MHRQL (OR: .62, 95% CI=.41- .94, P=.028) with a trend for reducing homelessness risk (OR: .60, .35-1.05, P=.69). For Latino adults, CEP resulted in greater probability of mental wellness (OR: 1.81, 1.05-3.13, P=.034) and a trend for increased physical activity (OR: 1.52, .93- 2.49, P=.091).Conclusions: Exploratory analyses of CEP for depression quality improvement suggests significant 6-month benefits in mental health outcomes for Black and Latino participants and trends for improvement in community-prioritized outcomes for both groups. Findings may inform research in multi-sector coalitions to promote equity in depression care. Ethn Dis. 2019;29(2):277- 286; doi:10.18865/ed.29.2.277