
In horses with osteoarthritis is treatment with intra-articular polyacrylamide gel more likely to reduce the severity of clinical signs associated with lameness when compared to treatment with intra-articular corticosteroid?
Author(s) -
Constance BowkettPritchard
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
veterinary evidence
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2396-9776
DOI - 10.18849/ve.v7i1.413
Subject(s) - medicine , lameness , osteoarthritis , physical therapy , evidence based medicine , clinical trial , randomized controlled trial , intensive care medicine , surgery , alternative medicine , pathology
PICO question
In horses with naturally occurring osteoarthritis, is treatment with intra-articular polyacrylamide gel more likely to reduce the severity of clinical signs associated with lameness when compared to treatment with intra-articular corticosteroid?
Clinical bottom line
Category of research question
Treatment
The number and type of study designs reviewed
Twelve studies; four case series, three uncontrolled prospective studies, one non-blinded, non-randomised control trial, one non-blinded randomised control trial, two systematic reviews and one systematic review and meta-analysis
Strength of evidence
Weak
Outcomes reported
Studies examined: Clinical signs relating to lameness after use of corticosteroid or polyacrylamide gel to treat osteoarthritis; improvement in lameness and treatment success (including return to work in some papers)
Conclusion
It is not possible to recommend one treatment over the other given the absence of studies which provide direct comparison. This highlights the need for further controlled and comparative studies
How to apply this evidence in practice
The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources.
Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.