
The use of metronidazole in adult dogs with acute onset, uncomplicated, diarrhoea
Author(s) -
Emma Rogers-Smith
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
veterinary evidence
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2396-9776
DOI - 10.18849/ve.v6i4.445
Subject(s) - metronidazole , medicine , placebo , observational study , clinical trial , randomized controlled trial , clinical endpoint , prospective cohort study , antibiotics , gastroenterology , pathology , alternative medicine , microbiology and biotechnology , biology
PICO question
In adult, non-geriatric, dogs with acute onset (<7 days duration) uncomplicated diarrhoea does the addition of metronidazole to a supportive care protocol such as dietary modification or probiotics (excluding other antimicrobials) reduce the time to resolution of diarrhoea compared to supportive care protocols alone?
Clinical bottom line
Category of research question
Treatment
The number and type of study designs reviewed
Four studies were included in this appraisal. Two prospective, double blinded, placebo controlled clinical trials, one prospective treatment trial and one retrospective longitudinal observational study
Strength of evidence
Weak
Outcomes reported
One study found a shortened duration of clinical signs (by 1.5 days; p = 0.04) in the metronidazole treated group compared to control. However, a separate study found no significant difference between control and metronidazole groups in the regards to resolution of clinical signs.
One study demonstrated a long standing (>28 day) negative impact of metronidazole treatment on gut microbiome with no difference in time to resolution of clinical signs when compared with faecal matter transplant
Conclusion
The current evidence for the superiority of metronidazole compared to supportive treatment alone is weak and at this time there is no evidence-based rationale for its use in cases of uncomplicated, acute, canine diarrhoea. Furthermore, the negative implications of metronidazole on the intestinal microbiome have been found to be long standing (>28 days as a minimum) and should not be discounted by the prescribing clinician
How to apply this evidence in practice
The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources.
Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.