When there is meaning in design? Two dimensions of the practice of designing (communication)
Author(s) -
Mariusz Wszołek
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
acta universitatis lodziensis folia litteraria polonica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2353-1908
pISSN - 1505-9057
DOI - 10.18778/1505-9057.58.13
Subject(s) - meaning (existential) , randomness , point (geometry) , computer science , code (set theory) , relation (database) , environmental graphic design , natural (archaeology) , sociology , epistemology , engineering ethics , architectural engineering , design education , engineering , business , mathematics , advertising , philosophy , statistics , geometry , set (abstract data type) , archaeology , database , history , programming language
John Thackara emphasised that 80% of the negative impact on the natural environment has its origin in design and the randomness of its application. Considering the entirety of design practices, one would have a hard time disputing this. In contemporary times, design understood as design practices has assumed a servile role in relation to big corporations. One can observe the consequences of such practices in real time: social exclusion, the lack of design consideration or consideration of end users, the failure of branding, and the polarisation of entire societies – these are only some dimensions of the current applications of design (including graphic design). Instead of the current applications, we need a change in the paradigm of both the theory of design and practical applications. Design needs a new code of application which would not only look good in social media, but would also be a clear point of reference in the design practice.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom