z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Abnormal laboratory results: Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein
Author(s) -
Michael J. Harrison
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
australian prescriber
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.735
H-Index - 26
eISSN - 1839-3942
pISSN - 0312-8008
DOI - 10.18773/austprescr.2015.034
Subject(s) - erythrocyte sedimentation rate , sedimentation , medicine , c reactive protein , immunology , inflammation , biology , sediment , paleontology
C-reactive protein is a better indicator of inflammation than the erythrocyte sedimentation rate. It is more sensitive and responds more quickly to changes in the clinical situation. False negative and false positive results are more common when measuring the erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Renal disease, female sex and older age increase the erythrocyte sedimentation rate. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate has value in detecting low-grade bone infection, and in monitoring some patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom