Open AccessEvaluation of soil solarisation and bio-fumigation for the management of bacterial spot of tomato
Author(s) -
K Misrak,
A Amare,
N Dechassa N Dechassa
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
african journal of food, agriculture, nutrition and development
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.22
H-Index - 11
eISSN - 1684-5374
pISSN - 1684-5358
DOI - 10.18697/ajfand.64.13595
Subject(s) - fumigation , soil solarization , horticulture , biology , population , xanthomonas campestris , leaf spot , crop , brassica , solarisation , agronomy , bacteria , genetics , demography , sociology
Soil -borne plant pathogens cause heavy losses to all major crops, leading to reductions in both yield and quality. Soil solarisation and bio- fumigation offer disease management options that are safe and reduce the use of pesticides for soil -borne plant pathogens. Mustard plant releases antimicrobial hydrolysis products, notably isothiocyanates when used as a bio- fumigant. Bacterial spot of tomato caused by Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria (Xcv) can survive in soil and plant debris, which serve as a primary inoculum for infecting the next tomato crop. An experiment was carried out with the objective of evaluating effects of soil solarisation and the use of Ethiopian mustard ( Brassica carinata A. Braun) as a bio -fumigant to control bacterial spot disease and on yield of tomato. The tr eatments consisted of six types of potted soil medium (solarised at Haramaya and Dire Dawa, bio -fumigated, biofumigated as well as solarised at Haramaya and Dire Dawa, and untreated control as non- solarised non- biofumigated pots). Treated tomato seeds were planted and fruit yields were compared among treatments. Potted soil was inoculated with the pathogen, Xcv, belonging to T2P2 race group. The total microbial and Xcv counts were done before as well as after setting up the experiment. The results revealed that solarisation reduced the population of Xcv from 10.68 to 8.79 CFU g -1 , total bacterial population from 11.27 to 9.86 CFU g -1 , and total actinomycete counts from 11.69 to 9.44 CFU g -1 while bio -fumigation had a non- significant effect on Xcv and total microbial counts. None of the treatments exhibited a significant effect on fungal counts. The fruit yield of tomato grown on biofumigated as well as solarised soil was the highest (91.18 t ha -1 ) as compared to the other treatments. It can, therefore, be con cluded that solarisation and bio- fumigation cannot be used as a bio- rational option for effective management of Xcv on tomato but the two methods could be used to increase tomato yield in the presence of the pathogen.