Open AccessRemedies and Sanctions for Non-compliance with Aspects Regarding the Authorization and Conduct of Special Methods of Supervision and Research
Author(s) -
Denisa Barbu
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
logos, universality, mentality, education, novelty. section law
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2458-1046
pISSN - 2284-5968
DOI - 10.18662/lumenlaw/8.1/35
Subject(s) - sanctions , legislation , compliance (psychology) , ratification , premise , convention , novelty , law and economics , political science , law , perspective (graphical) , voluntariness , enforcement , scope (computer science) , risk analysis (engineering) , business , engineering ethics , computer security , computer science , sociology , engineering , psychology , social psychology , epistemology , politics , philosophy , artificial intelligence , programming language
Using special methods for surveillance and research is no longer a social novelty, considering that both the technology and the criminality have a long existence. It is also important to mention the fact that the dynamics of the regulation of this institutions had as a base two premises: first, as normal, the ratification of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, and the second premise was the constant technological evolution. Regarding this last aspect, on a solid base it was considered that “the technical surveillance means will always be one step ahead of the legislation”. Concerning the perspective of the analysis regarding the existence and the implementing necessity of the legislation, we can easily conclude that these methods, techniques presents, de plano an intrusive character.