z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Pancasila dalam Pusaran Diskursus Liberalisme versus Komunitarisme
Author(s) -
Otto Gusti Ndegong Madung
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
khazanah
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2460-7606
DOI - 10.18592/khazanah.v13i2.768
Subject(s) - democracy , pluralism (philosophy) , identity (music) , epistemology , politics , political science , context (archaeology) , collective identity , sociology , value (mathematics) , law and economics , law , philosophy , computer science , paleontology , biology , aesthetics , machine learning
This paper attempts to show that a democratic order is not built onthe procedural ethics as assumed by liberals, but it is required a substantiveethical foundation. The reason is the democratic system is not contained ofatomistic individuals without social relations. A democratic process always movesin a society characterized by social relations and the various formation pro-cesses of complex communities. Democracy is built on formal yet fragilecollective identity. In the context of Indonesia, Pancasila is an expression of thecollective identity. As a collective identity, Pancasila has no ends and always inthe process of being and find themselves in a new way. At the end of thepaper, two methods; deliberative and agonistic democracy method are pre-sented. These methods are offered by contemporary political philosophy inresolving conflicts of value in the middle of pluralism.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here