z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
MEMBEDAH TEORI SOSIOLOGI: Teori Pertukaran (Exchange Theory) George Caspar Homans
Author(s) -
Wardani Wardani
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
jurnal studia insania/jurnal studi insania
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2549-3019
pISSN - 2355-1011
DOI - 10.18592/jsi.v4i1.1111
Subject(s) - proletariat , sociology , ideology , epistemology , social theory , social exchange theory , structuralism (philosophy of science) , capitalism , philosophy , politics , social science , law , political science
This article is aimed at analyzing critically George Caspar Homans’s theory of exchange. The critical analysis that may be called here simply as “maping ideology” embodied in theory is needed to place the theory within the specific social and political condition, intellectual background, school of thought having great influence on it, and so forth, and also to assesses its limitedness as a theoretical frame-work of scientific research to explain complicated social phenomenon or human interaction. Influenced by psychological and economic theories, Homans’s theory of exchange has been intended at the beginning by the author as attack against Marxism domination that addressed criticism to capitalism as macro-structure oppressing the proletariat by the ruling class and against Durkheimian structural functionalism. By addressing the attack against Marxism and because of his intellectual and social background, Homans’s theory then has been regarded as an explanation justifying the existing situation. Being attributed as psychological reductionism, as neglecting the important role of structure, and deterministic are some of the objections addressed to his theory.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here