Open AccessProspects for the Introduction of Automatic Registration of Intellectual Property Objects in the Customs Registry
Author(s) -
Aleksei M. Sorokin,
AUTHOR_ID
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
pravo intellektualʹnoj sobstvennosti
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2072-4322
DOI - 10.18572/2072-4322-2021-1-34-38
Subject(s) - context (archaeology) , service (business) , intellectual property , process (computing) , dialectic , relevance (law) , business , subject (documents) , accounting , computer science , political science , law , marketing , world wide web , paleontology , philosophy , epistemology , biology , operating system
Relevance. In the context of the transition to a digital economy, many processes at the level of federal executive bodies remain paper or only automated. Despite the system of interagency electronic interaction, electronic documents are often formed with the participation of officials. Thus, there is great potential to automate these processes, including through the provision of public services. Results. The main directions of development of the Federal Customs Service of Russia for the period until 2030 are considered. Directions related to customs protection of rights to intellectual property objects (IPO) are highlighted. Further materials are devoted to the absentee discussion of the prospects for the introduction of automatic provision of public services for the inclusion of IPO in the customs register of IPO. They are considered and classified for formalization (current and possible), nature and possibility of checking the information submitted when applying for the service. Three fundamentally possible models of automatic service provision are proposed. Their positive and negative aspects are shown. The potential results from the introduction of automatic registration of IPO in TROIS for all interested parties were evaluated. Methodology: the basis of the study is complex and systemic analysis, general scientific methods of cognition — analysis and synthesis, dialectical method, systematization and classification, process and system approaches, as well as a method of comparison. Discussion. The financial side of the proposed changes deserves a separate study. Any changes should be effective, which means a reasonable ratio of the effects obtained to the resources spent. Given the high level of uncertainty of the subject area, it is not possible to carry out such calculations. Also debatable is the question of which particular model of provision should be the basis of the automatic registration model: classical, currently in force, or modified and simplified, capable of providing full automation.