
Specifics of the Personnel Policy of State Servants: The Experience of the Russian Federation and the USA
Author(s) -
Dania A. Khayrullina
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
gosudarstvennaâ vlastʹ i mestnoe samoupravlenie
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1813-1247
DOI - 10.18572/1813-1247-2020-10-42-46
Subject(s) - civil servants , civil service , administration (probate law) , public administration , state (computer science) , russian federation , service (business) , institution , public policy , political science , function (biology) , public service , public relations , business , scale (ratio) , quality (philosophy) , law , marketing , politics , computer science , economic policy , algorithm , evolutionary biology , biology , philosophy , physics , quantum mechanics , epistemology
The article analyzes the significance of the personnel policy of the civil service as one of the most important links in the chain of public administration. The concept of personnel policy of civil servants, its main goals and objectives, which determine the specifics of the considered institution of law, is revealed. Modern problems that hinder the development of the state personnel policy are presented. The author touches upon the issue of digitalization, changes due to this large-scale phenomenon that should be implemented in the field of personnel policy of the public service, as well as possible difficulties associated with such a transformation. It is concluded that the main function of the personnel policy of the civil service at present should be the search for the most competent specialists with a high level of professional training, since this directly affects the quality of public administration. The features of the state personnel policy in the United States of America are considered, the concept of “positive recruitment” is revealed. The possibility of introducing some elements developed by the American personnel policy of the civil service into the current personnel system of the Russian Federation is evaluated.