Open AccessOn Review of an Expert’s Report on Action Proceedings in the Civil and Commercial Procedure
Author(s) -
Stanislav I. Zernov
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
arbitražnyj i graždanskij process
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1812-383X
DOI - 10.18572/1812-383x-2021-1-29-35
Subject(s) - expert opinion , adversarial system , credibility , expert elicitation , subject matter expert , action (physics) , judicial opinion , expert system , legal expert system , political science , law , civil procedure , engineering ethics , computer science , engineering , artificial intelligence , medicine , statistics , physics , mathematics , quantum mechanics , intensive care medicine
On claim proceedings, as a rule, an judicial expert's opinion is required to establish the objective side of the dispute. Assessing the credibility of the expert's report for the court is difficult, because it requires the use of special expert knowledge. Legal issues of preparation of the critical review (another expert's opinion) on the judicial expert' report, as a way to implement the adversarial principle of parties, are discussed. Provides guidance on the interaction between counsel and expert in the case of challenging the judicial expert's opinion.