Open AccessTsintsadze Nina S. Associate Professor of the Department of Theory and History of State and Law of the Derzhavin Tambov State University PhD (History), Associate Professor
Author(s) -
Nina S. Tsintsadze
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
istoriâ gosudarstva i prava
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1812-3805
DOI - 10.18572/1812-3805-2020-11-19-26
Subject(s) - arbitration , law , context (archaeology) , relevance (law) , state (computer science) , publicity , political science , dispute resolution , economic justice , sociology , openness to experience , history , psychology , computer science , archaeology , algorithm , social psychology
In the article the content of the draft reform of the arbitration court, prepared on behalf of Emperor Alexander I G.R. Derzhavin is analyzed in detail. As sources, both published and archival materials were used. The attitude of contemporaries and descendants to this project was ambiguous. Lawyers controversially evaluated the project of the Minister of Justice and the Attorney General of the Senate. Many of them drew attention to the complexity of the proposed methods of arbitration of legal disputes. It is noted that for the beginning of the XIX century this project of reorganization of the arbitration court was rather bold, as it allowed publicity, wordlessness, openness of legal proceedings. In many ways Derzhavin’s proposals were ahead of time. The conclusion is drawn about the relevance of the project in the context of modern court reform and the expansion of the practice of alternative dispute resolution methods.