z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Exploring the relationship between validity and comparability in assessment
Author(s) -
Victoria Crisp
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
london review of education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.326
H-Index - 21
eISSN - 1474-8479
pISSN - 1474-8460
DOI - 10.18546/lre.15.3.13
Subject(s) - comparability , context (archaeology) , mainstream , psychology , management science , political science , mathematics , engineering , geography , archaeology , combinatorics , law
This article discusses how comparability relates to current mainstream conceptions of validity, in the context of educational assessment. Relevant literature was used to consider the relationship between these concepts. The article concludes that, depending on the exact claims being made about the appropriate interpretations and uses of the results of an assessment, several comparability concerns fall within the remit of validation. The current exploration supports the addition of comparability to validation studies and may be useful in the context of a growing emphasis on the provision of validity evidence for public examinations.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here