Open AccessADMINISTRATIVE DISCRETION AND INSTRUMENTS OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIONS: ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL AND DEONTOLOGICAL DIMENSIONS
Author(s) -
P. P. Bylik,
I. A. Osadcha
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
pravova deržava
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2411-2054
DOI - 10.18524/2411-2054.2021.44.245077
Subject(s) - discretion , legislation , normative , administration (probate law) , political science , professional administration , coercion (linguistics) , administrative law , democracy , persuasion , public administration , law , public relations , law and economics , business , sociology , politics , psychology , social psychology , philosophy , linguistics
The article focuses on the relationship between public administration and legal deontology. Public administration is a renewed form of public administration. The difference is that public administration is a more democratic process of state-authoritative impact on social relations. This democracy is manifested in the forms and methods of managerial activity used. Among the forms and methods of public administration, a softer set of forms is selected – an appropriate combination of legal and non-legal forms, the method of persuasion and coercion. The very activity has an executive and administrative nature. The executive orientation implies the call of public administrations to promote the practical implementation of laws. Orders – to adopt and implement legal acts of administration. Forms and methods together constitute the tools of activity of public administrations. Executive-administrative activity is carried out through appropriate managerial procedures. The basis of activity is administrative discretion. It consists in the possibility at one’s own risk to use forms and methods in their totality depending on the choice of the public administrator himself. This requires its appropriate level of professional training and the necessary level of compliance of the activity of a public administrator with increased moral and ethical parameters. Given the lack of administrative and procedural legislation, it is proposed to consider the use of discretionary powers as permissible with the possibility of expanding their limits within the law. But this is only on condition of introducing into the normative regulation of public administrators’ activity the code of their professional conduct. Such a code should contain an ideal model of professional conduct of public administrators. Conformity of professional conduct of an official of public administration body to the requirements of the code is a prerequisite for the implementation of its social mission. The code of ethics of a public administrator should contain a set of requirements of moral and ethical nature, compliance with which in the activities of the public administrator will contribute to the implementation of constitutional requirements on the social orientation and conditionality of the activities of the state and all its bodies.