Open AccessDO COMPREHENSIVE AND SELECTIVE CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK REALLY WORK FOR L2 WRITING ACCURACY? AN OVERVIEW FROM INDONESIAN CONTEXT
Author(s) -
Herlinawati Herlinawati,
Ali Saukah,
Nur Mukminatien,
Uzlifatul Masruroh Isnawati,
Adolf Bastian
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
humanities and social sciences reviews
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2395-6518
DOI - 10.18510/hssr.2020.8110
Subject(s) - corrective feedback , indonesian , novelty , context (archaeology) , originality , computer science , psychology , mathematics education , linguistics , social psychology , creativity , paleontology , philosophy , biology
Purpose of the study: Investigating the effect of corrective feedback on Indonesian students' writing accuracy was the aim of this present study.
Methodology: The methods used were a true experiment with a pretest-treatment-posttest-delayed posttest design was employed to address the research questions and a two-way ANOVA to examine.
Main Findings: The data collected was the grammatical accuracy scores from the three groups (comprehensive corrective feedback/CCF, selective corrective feedback/SCF, and non-grammatical feedback/NGF).
Applications of this study: Indonesian EFL students’.
Novelty/Originality of this study: EFL writing teacher is suggested to accommodate the integrated teaching of grammatical features in a communicative context.