z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
DO COMPREHENSIVE AND SELECTIVE CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK REALLY WORK FOR L2 WRITING ACCURACY? AN OVERVIEW FROM INDONESIAN CONTEXT
Author(s) -
Herlinawati Herlinawati,
Ali Saukah,
Nur Mukminatien,
Uzlifatul Masruroh Isnawati,
Adolf Bastian
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
humanities and social sciences reviews
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2395-6518
DOI - 10.18510/hssr.2020.8110
Subject(s) - corrective feedback , indonesian , novelty , context (archaeology) , originality , computer science , psychology , mathematics education , linguistics , social psychology , creativity , paleontology , philosophy , biology
Purpose of the study: Investigating the effect of corrective feedback on Indonesian students' writing accuracy was the aim of this present study. Methodology: The methods used were a true experiment with a pretest-treatment-posttest-delayed posttest design was employed to address the research questions and a two-way ANOVA to examine. Main Findings: The data collected was the grammatical accuracy scores from the three groups (comprehensive corrective feedback/CCF, selective corrective feedback/SCF, and non-grammatical feedback/NGF). Applications of this study: Indonesian EFL students’. Novelty/Originality of this study: EFL writing teacher is suggested to accommodate the integrated teaching of grammatical features in a communicative context.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom