
Problematics Independence of Witness as a Law Enforcement Institution
Author(s) -
Yudo Adiananto,
Abdul Rachmad Budiono,
Tunggul Anshari SN,
Iwаn Permаdi
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
international journal of multicultural and multireligious understanding
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2364-5369
DOI - 10.18415/ijmmu.v7i7.1867
Subject(s) - witness , institution , officer , law , law enforcement , independence (probability theory) , enforcement , position (finance) , executive power , power (physics) , intervention (counseling) , political science , government (linguistics) , business , psychology , politics , linguistics , statistics , physics , philosophy , mathematics , finance , quantum mechanics , psychiatry
The position of the Prosecutor's Office which is institutionally under the executive power but carrying out the duties and functions that are part of the judicial authority clearly raises a problem of its own in the world of law enforcement. The prosecutor's office as a law enforcement officer in the prosecution field is required to be fair and objective and independent in faithfully carrying out his duties and authorities, but placing the prosecutor's position as a government institution under the executive very vulnerable from power intervention. This condition is very dilemmatic to support the attorney's performance in carrying out his functions and authority.