z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Why Using Religious Arguments in the Euthanasia Discussion is Problematic
Author(s) -
Theo A. Boer
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
revista latinoamericana de bioetica/revista latinoamericana de bioética
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2462-859X
pISSN - 1657-4702
DOI - 10.18359/rlbi.5450
Subject(s) - protestantism , assisted suicide , context (archaeology) , right to die , position (finance) , sociology , epistemology , law , environmental ethics , social psychology , psychology , political science , philosophy , history , archaeology , finance , economics
In discussions about assisted dying (euthanasia, assisted suicide), those who argue ‘against’ legalisation often reason from a religious angle, whereas those ‘in favour’ adopt a secular stance. The Dutch experience is more nuanced: here, euthanasia advocacy largely originated from protestant religious believers. In this contribution, I criticise the use of religious arguments favouring any specific position. Religion may provide a heuristic context to explore norms relevant in the discussion, and religion may help us formulate our personal stance. But when it comes to societal debates (often focusing on whether or not to legalise euthanasia), we should concentrate on legal, societal, empirical, and ethical arguments that are understandable to all.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here