z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Anti-Naturalistic Arguments From Reason
Author(s) -
Graham Oppy
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
roczniki filozoficzne
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.128
H-Index - 3
eISSN - 2450-002X
pISSN - 0035-7685
DOI - 10.18290/rf2201.2
Subject(s) - naturalism , prima facie , argument (complex analysis) , epistemology , philosophy , identity (music) , aesthetics , chemistry , biochemistry
This paper discusses a wide range of anti-naturalistic argument from reason due to Balfour, Haldane, Joad, Lewis, Taylor, Moreland, Plantinga, Reppert, and Hasker. I argue that none of these arguments poses a serious challenge to naturalists who are identity theorists. Further, I argue that some of these arguments do not even pose prima facie plausible challenges to naturalism. In the concluding part of my discussion, I draw attention to some distinctive differences between Hasker’s anti-naturalistic arguments and the other anti-naturalistic arguments mentioned above.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here