
Novel Robotic Assistive Technologies: Choosing Appropriate Training for Healthcare Professionals
Author(s) -
Lucie Ménard,
Axel Petit,
Emilie Leblong,
Maria Stein,
Eleni Hatzidimitriadou,
R. Khemmar,
S. Manship,
Rachael Morris,
Nicolas Ragot,
P. Gallien
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
modelling, measurement and control. c, energetics, chemistry, earth, environmental and biomedical problems
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1259-5977
DOI - 10.18280/mmc_c.811-408
Subject(s) - wheelchair , context (archaeology) , health care , health professionals , unit (ring theory) , training (meteorology) , knowledge management , computer science , medical education , psychology , medicine , paleontology , physics , mathematics education , world wide web , meteorology , economics , biology , economic growth
One of the key challenges for the training of healthcare professionals (HCPs) is to maintain a good understanding and knowledge of new assistive technologies (ATs) that are currently on the market [1]. Indeed, at present, available training on ATs is limited and does not meet the practice-related needs of HCPs. It is in this context that the ADAPT European project aims to develop a new AT training programme for healthcare professionals, which will also introduce them to the project’s new AT developments - a smart powered wheelchair and a virtual reality wheelchair-driving simulator. The program consists of six multimodal units; five delivered via e-learning and one through a blended method of e-learning and face-to-face sessions. The development of the content is guided by findings from an earlier literature review and an online survey of AT training needs for HCP’s, both undertaken by the ADAPT cross-national research team, comprised of UK and French experts. The level of technical difficulty increases with successive units in order to train all HCPs to use innovative ATs more widely in their practice. A Learning Management System enables the dissemination of the e-learning AT program. Preliminary results from participant unit-specific evaluations available at this stage are overall positive and encouraging.