z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
2D/3D RANS and LES Calculations of Natural Convection in a Laterally-Heated Cylindrical Enclosure Using Boussinesq and Temperature-Dependent Formulations
Author(s) -
Hooman Enayati,
M. J. Braun
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
heat and technology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.283
H-Index - 29
ISSN - 0392-8764
DOI - 10.18280/ijht.390637
Subject(s) - reynolds averaged navier–stokes equations , boussinesq approximation (buoyancy) , mechanics , large eddy simulation , natural convection , computational fluid dynamics , enclosure , rotational symmetry , convection , turbulence , physics , rayleigh number , engineering , telecommunications
This article presents an investigation of fluid flow and natural convection heat transfer in a cylindrical enclosure heated laterally. Two-dimensional (2D) Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations and three-dimensional (3D) Large Eddy Simulation (LES) calculations are conducted using commercial computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software, ANSYS FLUENT. The Rayleigh number (Ra) = 2E+7 is constant in all of the simulations and is based on a length scale that is equal to the ratio of volume to the lateral area of the reactor, i.e., R/2, where R is the radius of the reactor. The validity of the Boussinesq approximation is analyzed by comparing calculations using both the Boussinesq approximation and temperature-dependent properties (non-Boussinesq approach) using 2D RANS and 3D LES (Dynamic Smagorinsky) formulations. Moreover, 2D axisymmetric k-ω SST RANS model will be implemented to investigate whether the 2D axisymmetric model can give results that are comparable to those of the 3D LES (Dynamic Smagorinsky) model when the corresponding longitudinal or azimuthal cross section are compared. In other words, the validity of using a 2D model instead of a 3D model for the current geometry, flow regime and thermal boundary conditions will be discussed. The flow and temperature contours of these two types of simulations are analyzed, compared to determine the various aspects of each case and discussed for deeper physical insight.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here