z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Conceptual issues on Kant’s theory of inner experience
Author(s) -
Héctor Luis Pacheco Acosta
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
revista de filosofía uis/revista filosofía uis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2145-8529
pISSN - 1692-2484
DOI - 10.18273/revfil.v19n2-2020007
Subject(s) - epistemology , transcendental number , apperception , consciousness , apprehension , metaphysics , content (measure theory) , relation (database) , simple (philosophy) , philosophy , psychology , mathematics , computer science , mathematical analysis , database
this paper discusses the use of certain terms associated to I. Kant’s account of inner experience. Inner experience is a subject matter relevant in Kant’s thought, which encompasses metaphysical and anthropological issues worthy of consideration. By examining the Critique of Pure Reason and the Anthropology from a pragmatic point of view, one can see the confused use of the terms: inner sense, empirical, pure, and transcendental apperception, discursive and intuitive self-consciousness, consciousness of oneself divided into reflection and apprehension, intellectual and empirical consciousness of one’s existence. Therefore, I focus on the philosophical meaning of the previous terms and their relation to the problem of inner experience, which depends upon the outer experience. Finally, I deal with the problem of the content of inner sense, suggesting that its content does not correspond to a single, simple thing, but rather to a flux of inner representations.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here