Open AccessMethods for conceptual and preliminary seismic design of buildings with steel structure
Author(s) -
Tiago Ribeiro,
Ana M. Sousa
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
avances en ciencias e ingenierías/avances en ciencias e ingenierías (en línea)
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2528-7788
pISSN - 1390-5384
DOI - 10.18272/aci.v11i2.1350
Subject(s) - eurocode , context (archaeology) , seismic analysis , code (set theory) , pretext , computer science , building code , european union , action (physics) , architectural engineering , philosophy of design , engineering , construction engineering , civil engineering , set (abstract data type) , law , structural engineering , political science , business , paleontology , physics , quantum mechanics , politics , biology , programming language , economic policy , philosophy education
Throughout the last two decades, seismic design standards evolved to ever more comprehensive and detailed prescriptions, stressing out the need for design methods that deal with earthquake effects not as actions, but as a design philosophy. The Eurocode 8 adoption as national law throughout the European Union countries and informally in many parts of Africa, Asia and Latin America is the pretext for the current study. It aims to provide some guidance to the seismic design of steel structures as well as to the Eurocode 8 implementation by the designers.Some lines on the preliminary design of structural systems were written based on several real cases of structures designed taking into account the seismic action. Such a content is, usually, relevant in any design guide, given its value in enhancing the design technical and economical content. However, it is now of utter significance at the current context as an essential tool to facilitate the safety checking of several code requirements.Some of the Eurocode 8 prescriptions are then decoded, explained and justified based on the supportive bibliography. The information is subsequently ordered as a design guide, where some procedures are proposed to cope with the code interrelated prescriptions and one structural solution is proposed in order to overcome a design challenge while complying with the code.One last but not less relevant addressed issue is the fact that some Eurocode 8 prescriptions may be reviewed, in the eyes of a designer, given its practical outcome. Such issues are identified, explained and some slight code adjustments are suggested.