
Should there be a 'Right to the City'?
Author(s) -
Heather Lang
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
potentia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2562-8534
DOI - 10.18192/potentia.v6i0.4417
Subject(s) - right to the city , context (archaeology) , phrase , space (punctuation) , sociology , set (abstract data type) , law and economics , law , human rights , political science , environmental ethics , history , politics , philosophy , linguistics , archaeology , computer science , programming language
Henri Lefebvre coined the phrase the ‘right to the city’ in 1968, which encapsulates a set of collective rather than individual rights. It is based on two principals for urban dwellers: the right to participate in decision-making in regard to the city and the right to appropriate or “physically access, occupy, and use urban space” (Purcell 2002, 103). This original social-philosophical discussion has recently evolved to include legal arguments in the context of a global system which espouses the supremacy of human rights. Though there is not anywhere with a functioning, Lefebvre-inspired “right to the city”, radical and incremental attempts to create its foundations are occurring in South America and common law jurisdictions.