Open AccessAn early echocardiographic prediction for functional myocardial recovery after ST elevation myocardial infarction
Author(s) -
Alper Karakuş,
Berat Uğuz
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
kardiologiâ
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2412-5660
pISSN - 0022-9040
DOI - 10.18087/cardio.2021.1.n1477
Subject(s) - medicine , cardiology , stunning , ventricle , ejection fraction , myocardial infarction , myocardial stunning , diastole , heart failure , ischemia , blood pressure
Goals Discrimination of the time course of functional recovery in early period following ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has prognostic importance. This study aims to establish the ability of the combined systolic-diastolic index (E / (Ea x Sa), for differentiating recoverable myocardium or persistent non-viability in subjects with STEMI. Material and methods 77 patients with first acute STEMI were enrolled to the study. Serial transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) examinations were performed at the time of the admission (immediately after reperfusion), hospital discharge (5±1 days) and control examination (30±2 days). To assess the association between E / (Ea×Sa) index and myocardial recovery, two categories (Transient stunning and persistent non-viability) were defined on basis of improvement of left ventricle ejection fraction (LV EF) (Improvement was defined as an increase more than 10 % in LV EF at day 30 compared to baseline). Results 55 patients (71.4 %) had improvement of LV EF and 24 patients (28.6 %) had no recovery of systolic function (30 days LV EF 48.78±6.1 vs. 39.31±8.1 %, p=0.01). The E / (Ea×Sa) index were significantly higher in the “non-viability” than in stunning group on predischarge and 1 month (1.61±0.64 vs 1.25±0.43, p=0.01 and 1.33±0.25 vs 1.14±0.21, p=0.01, respectively). The change in the E / (Ea×Sa) index in early period (within 5±1 days) was higher in the stunning group (26 %) compared to non-viability group (15 %) (p=0.033). E / (Ea×Sa) index was found to be a significant predictor of myocardial recovery in multivariable logistic regression (OR 0.91, 95 % CI 0.83–0.98, p=0.001). Roc curve showed that the cutoff value of E / (Ea×Sa) index is 1.29 with 73 % of sensitivity and 61 % of specificity (AUC: 0.71, p=0.01, CI: 0.54–0.89). Conclusions Our findings suggest that E / (Ea×Sa) index is a strong predictor of functional recovery; the odds of recovery decreases as E / (Ea×Sa) index value increases.