Open AccessFrom Superman to Super Jesus: Constructions of Masculinity and Disability on the Silver Screen
Author(s) -
Darla Schumm,
Jennifer L. Koosed
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
disability studies quarterly
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2159-8371
pISSN - 1041-5718
DOI - 10.18061/dsq.v29i2.917
Subject(s) - masculinity , heaven , incarnation , gospel , superman , ideal (ethics) , passion , art , philosophy , literature , sociology , theology , aesthetics , gender studies , art history , psychology , social psychology , epistemology
Normal 0false false falseMicrosoftInternetExplorer4/* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;}One of the dominant images of Jesus emerging in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries is that of the Super Jesus. Building on the hyper-masculinity of the American superhero, the recent portrayals of Jesus in Mel Gibson’s The Passion of the Christ and Philip Saville’s The Gospel of John demonstrate how the figure of Jesus is often represented as a Super Jesus – strong, impervious to pain, ultimately triumphant. In these movies, Jesus' body is subjected to extreme violence and yet he is able to control and transcend his broken body both before and after death. Drawing on the work of disability scholars both in and outside of religious studies, this paper argues that the model of the Super Jesus constructs an ideal of masculinity that prevents the exploration of alternative theologies of disability, alternatives that present different understandings of Incarnation, resurrection, and heaven.