z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Utilitarismos ou equidade? Dilemas éticos na política social e ambiental
Author(s) -
Margarida Queirós
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
finisterra
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.242
H-Index - 10
eISSN - 2182-2905
pISSN - 0430-5027
DOI - 10.18055/finis1661
Subject(s) - tragedy of the commons , equity (law) , dilemma , welfare economics , social equality , commons , utilitarianism , natural resource , land value , public economics , intergenerational equity , social dilemma , value (mathematics) , economics , political science , law and economics , natural resource economics , sustainability , law , microeconomics , ecology , philosophy , epistemology , biology , machine learning , computer science
UTILITARIANISM OR EQUITY? DILEMMAS FOR ENVIRONMENT AND LAND USE. The aim of this note is to stimulate discussion as to the criteria behind land use planning and the distribution of natural resources to achieve a sense of social well-being. When determining strategies on how to use these resources and other environmental services, considerations involving efficiency versus equity reveal value choices and contradictory opinions that we seek to question. Numerousexamples demonstrate that certain economic policy choices which affect environment and land planning are responsible for the emergence of predicaments known as the ‘prisoner’s dilemma’ and the ‘tragedy of the commons’. ‘No free lunch’ belongs to a group of conservation laws that steers towards the painful awareness that traditional economic policy has still severe limitations.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here