
Should American Antitrust Laws Protect Only American Consumers?
Author(s) -
Thanh G. Phan
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
american journal of trade and policy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2313-4755
pISSN - 2313-4747
DOI - 10.18034/ajtp.v4i3.424
Subject(s) - statute , government (linguistics) , consent decree , law , consumer welfare , rule of reason , welfare , economics , political science , business , supreme court , philosophy , linguistics
The United States adopted its first antitrust statute in 1890. Despite their long history of development, American antitrust laws do not specify any objectives. The primary objective of the American antitrust laws centers a long-standing debate among many scholars. This paper firstly argues that the American antitrust laws were designed to promote consumer welfare. However, exemptions for export cartels confine the concept of “consumers” protected by the Sherman Act to those in the U.S territory. This paper secondly proposes that exemptions for export cartels should be abolished for two reasons. First, the exemptions make American antitrust policy inconsistent because they do not reflect the objective that promotes consumer welfare. Second, from an international perspective, exemptions for export cartels are inconsistent with the efforts of the American Government to apply the Sherman Act extraterritorially—a measure that aims to protect consumers from international cartels.