z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Efficacy and Safety Analysis of the New Aspheric Hydrophobic Acrylic Monofocal IOL Implantation at Short-Term Follow-Up
Author(s) -
К.B. Pershin,
N.F. Pashinova,
А. Ю. Цыганков,
E. A. Korneeva
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
oftalʹmologiâ
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.133
H-Index - 5
eISSN - 2500-0845
pISSN - 1816-5095
DOI - 10.18008/1816-5095-2021-4-845-851
Subject(s) - medicine , ophthalmology , surgery
Aim . To evaluate the results of implantation of a new hydrophobic acrylic monofocal IOL in an automated preloaded delivery system in the short-term follow-up period. Patients and methods . The prospective study included 89 patients (114 eyes) after bilateral or monolateral Clareon IOL implantation with a mean follow-up of 2.1 ± 0.4 (1–4) months. The age range was 53 to 87 (71.1 ± 5.2) years. A corneal incision of 1.8 mm was used in all cases. For implantation using the AutonoMe® system , the incision was enlarged by 0.2 mm for implantation IOL 26 D and higher. IOL optical power was calculated using the SRK/T formula; retrospective analysis was performed using the Hoffer Q, Haigis, Holladay II, Olsen, Barrett Universal II, and Kane formulas. Results . In all studied periods (1 day, 1 week and 1 month) there was statistically significant (p < 0.05) increase both of NCDVA (from 0.13 ± 0.02 in the preoperative period to 0.81 ± 0.07 in 1 month after surgical intervention), and BCDVA (from 0.32 ± 0.15 before surgery to 0.94 ± 0.11 after surgery). When assessing the percentage of eyes with an BCDVA of 0.9 or higher, a statistically significant (p < 0.05) difference was shown in all studied periods. The lowest MAE was shown for the Barrett Universal II (0.292), SRK/T (0.312) Kane (0.301), and Olsen (0.325) formulas. For the Hoffer Q and Holladay 2 formulas, MAE values were significantly higher (p < 0.05). The highest frequency of achieving the target refraction of ± 0.25 D was shown for the Barrett Universal II and Kane formulas (68 and 69 %, respectively), and the lowest for the Hoffer Q and Holladay 2 formulas (28 and 35 %, respectively). The primary endpoint of the study (BCDVA = 1.0) was achieved in 95.6 % (n = 109), with a deviation in BCVA of ± 0.1 noted in 4 eyes (3.5 %). No glistening was detected in the follow-up period up to 4 months. Conclusion. The paper presents an analysis of the first experience with the implantation of new Clareon monofocal IOLs in Russian Federation. The results of implantation of a new hydrophobic acrylic monofocal IOL in an automated preloaded delivery system showed a good clinical and functional effect, a high frequency of achieving the target result and the absence of significant side effects. The Kane, Barrett Universal II, and SRK/T formulas, using the Verion diagnostic navigation system, are recommended for calculating the optical power of the new IOL.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here