z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Galician Wild Ponies. Socio-Economic Context and Environmental Benefits: Galicia Area Report and Case Study for GrazeLIFE (LIFE18 PRE NL 002)
Author(s) -
Jaime Fagúndez,
Laura Lagos,
Jose A. Cortés-Vázquez,
Flávia Canastra
Publication year - 2022
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Reports
DOI - 10.17979/spudc.9788497498234
Subject(s) - geography , context (archaeology) , afforestation , forestry , grazing , woodland , biodiversity , land use , agroforestry , natura 2000 , dominance (genetics) , recreation , environmental protection , ecology , environmental science , biochemistry , chemistry , archaeology , gene , biology
The University of A Coruña is partner of the GRAZELIFE LIFE preparatory project (LIFE 18 PRE/NL002). We contributed to the main aim of the project of promoting sustainable grazing by large herbivores, with the study of the particular case of Galician wild ponies as a natural grazing semi-wild land use model, and alternative land uses of short and long-term afforestation, extensive grazing and abandonment. We selected two sub-areas in Galicia representing different situations in dominant land uses and the wild ponies’ system. Xistral, in the north, is a protected Natura 2000 site covered by wet heaths and bogs, ponies are owned by commoners that are mainly cattle farmers. Groba, in the south, is a drier area with dominance of forestry use and high frequency of wildfires, where ponies are owned by non-professional farmers. We performed twenty personal semi-structured interviews with pony owners, land owners and related experts from different sectors (afforestation, tourism, conservation NGOs), and performed two focus groups. We discussed topics such as their relation with ponies, the challenges they face, their demands and feelings on the policies, including CAP subsidies or compensations for wolf attacks, and their expectations for the future. In the field, we selected representative stands of each land use model in each sub-area and performed a systematic record of plant species, measures of plant biomass, and collected soil samples. Measures were used as proxies of biodiversity changes, carbon storage and wildfire risk, to compare between the selected models.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here