z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Peradilan In Absentia bagi Pelanggar Lalu Lintas yang Berkeadilan
Author(s) -
Haklainul Dunggio,
Bambang Sugiri,
Rachmad Syafa’at
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
jurnal ilmiah pendidikan pancasila dan kewarganegaraan
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2527-8495
pISSN - 2528-0767
DOI - 10.17977/um019v4i2p259-268
Subject(s) - conviction , legislature , normative , law , criminal trial , psychology , political science , computer security , computer science
This study discusses in absentia trial system for traffic violations in Indonesia, proofing in traffic violations, and whether or not there is a need to prove errors in traffic violations. This study uses a normative juridical method with a legislative approach. The regulation of in absentia trial system has three requirements. First, absolute in absentia trial system. Second, the judge examines, adjudicates, and decides cases without the presence of the offender. Third, the offender is not called to attend the trials. Proofing of traffic violations has resulted from a valid evidence coupled with the judge's conviction. The faults of offenders in traffic violations must still be proven, not enough just by action.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here