
COMPARISON OF BASIC MAINTENANCE CONCEPTS USING WITNESS
Author(s) -
VLADIMIRA SCHINDLEROVA,
AUTHOR_ID,
IVANA SAJDLEROVA,
AUTHOR_ID
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
mm science journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.195
H-Index - 10
eISSN - 1805-0476
pISSN - 1803-1269
DOI - 10.17973/mmsj.2021_12_2021114
Subject(s) - witness , production (economics) , quality (philosophy) , predictive maintenance , computer science , risk analysis (engineering) , reliability engineering , operations management , process management , business , engineering , economics , philosophy , epistemology , programming language , macroeconomics
Maintenance is a complex, extensive and important issue in terms of its impact on the quality of manufactured products or services provided in all areas of industry. The importance of predictive maintenance for the industry in the 21st century is crucial. However, the right approach to maintenance management is often underestimated in many companies today, although it can have a very positive effect on the company’s efficiency. Using the example of a practical application, the paper includes a comparison of three main maintenance concepts – classical (reactive), planned, predictive through the simulation software Witness. Maintenance concepts are compared in terms of their ability to solve and eliminate failures that occur in production facilities during operation.