Open AccessCriminal liability for destruction or damage forest plantations: qualification questions
Author(s) -
Y A Timoshenko,
I. A. Timoshenko
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
rossijskij žurnal pravovyh issledovanij
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2410-7522
pISSN - 2410-4965
DOI - 10.17816/rjls18175
Subject(s) - legislature , criminal code , criminal liability , interpretation (philosophy) , liability , criminal responsibility , political science , compliance (psychology) , code (set theory) , criminal procedure , law , criminal case , criminal law , psychology , computer science , philosophy , social psychology , linguistics , set (abstract data type) , programming language
The article deals with issues arising in the classification of acts, responsibility for which is provided Art. 260 and Art. 261 of the Criminal Code. Based on the analysis of judicial practice, as well as the views expressed in the scientific literature, it is concluded that the discrepancies in the interpretation of criminal prohibitions on the destruction and damage of forest plantations, due to the imperfection of the legislative structures Articles 260 and 261 of the Criminal Code, which became possible due to non-compliance with the rules of legislative technique