z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The term «protest» in constitutional law: the meaning and contents
Author(s) -
Mariya Riekkinen
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
rossijskij žurnal pravovyh issledovanij
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2410-7522
pISSN - 2410-4965
DOI - 10.17816/rjls18124
Subject(s) - constitution , meaning (existential) , criticism , law , term (time) , political science , constitutional law , public law , sociology , epistemology , philosophy , physics , quantum mechanics
This article attempts to define the meaning and contents of the concept «protest» as it exists in constitutional law. The author abstains from acknowledging «the right to protest» in Russia’s constitutional law system. Instead it is studied how the opportunities to express the protest against decisions, actions (or lack thereof) by public authorities can be implemented as the modes of substantive public participation. The author considers the differences between formal and substantive public participation while emphasizing that the Constitution of the Russian Federation avoids direct usage of such terms as «protest», «criticism», or «objections» with respect to both types of such participation.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here