Open AccessErrors and сomplications in the treatment of children with anorectal malformations
Author(s) -
E.S. Pimenova,
Пименова Евгения Сергеевна,
D.S. Tarasova,
Тарасова Дарья Сергеевна,
T.D. Marchuk,
Морозов Дмитрий Дмитриевич,
D.A. Morozov,
Морозов Дмитрий Анатольевич
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
rossijskij vestnik detskoj hirurgii, anesteziologii i reanimatologii
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2587-6554
pISSN - 2219-4061
DOI - 10.17816/psaic671
Subject(s) - medicine , rectovaginal fistula , surgery , imperforate anus , fistula , anal stenosis , rectum , constipation , anus , cloaca , anorectal manometry , fecal incontinence , colostomy , hemorrhoids , anatomy
Purpose. This manuscript aims to introduce errors and complications of diagnosis and treatment in children with anorectal malformations (ARM).
Methods. A retrospective analysis of 63 children with ARM treated at a single tertiary Speransky childrens Hospital.
Results. The patients ages ranged from 2 mo to 17 y. o. (median, 6 y. o.). The types of ARM included: rectourethral fistula 27%, rectoperineal fistula 17.5%, rectovestibular fistula 15.9%, rectobladderneck fistula 6.3%, no fistula 7.9%, cloaca 11.1%, cloaca with urogenital sinus and disorder of sex development 1.6%, pouch colon 1.6%, rectal stenosis 4.8%, anal duplication 3.2%, and rectovaginal fistula 3.2%. Of these patients, 76% underwent surgery earlier at another hospital (surgical treatment completed), 14% had stomas, and 10% did not have any prior procedures. The historical analysis showed diagnostic errors in 48% of children (untimely diagnosis, incorrect interpretation of the ARM variant, prolonged delay in anorectoplasty). Errors led to emergency procedures or changes in subsequent surgical treatment (further ostomy, excess bowel resection) in 22% of cases. After anorectoplasty (stenosis, mislocated anus/rectum, rectal prolapse), complications were detected in 56% of cases, whereas ostomy complications were observed in 5% of cases. Long-term problems after the surgical treatment (constipation, incontinence, and pseudoincontinence) were evident in 98% of children. Different surgical reconstructive techniques of the sphincter formation had been performed previously in 13% of patients. Moreover, they most often had spinal pathology as the cause of functional disorders. Only half of the childrens parents had information about bowel management, 38% did not follow the recommendations and usually had fecal impaction and pseudoincontinence. 45% of children/parents performed non-effective or irregular enemas and required corrective treatment.
Conclusion. It is recommended that Russian pediatric surgeons treat children with ARM, according to Russian pediatric surgeons guidelines consistent with international protocols to avoid errors and complications.