Standardized ophthalmic tests for evaluating reading parameters: a brief historical review | Zendy

S. А. Koskin | Zendy; Ivan R. Stepanets | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Standardized ophthalmic tests for evaluating reading parameters: a brief historical review

Author(s) -

S. А. Koskin,

Ivan R. Stepanets

Publication year - 2020

Publication title -

ophthalmology reports

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

eISSN - 2412-5423

pISSN - 1998-7102

DOI - 10.17816/ov50885

Subject(s) - reading (process) , chart , test (biology) , optometry , computer science , paragraph , psychology , medicine , mathematics , statistics , linguistics , world wide web , paleontology , philosophy , biology

In the review, the analysis of the most common ophthalmic standardized tests for evaluating reading was carried out: BaileyLovie Word Reading Charts, MNREAD Acuity Chart, Radner reading chart, SmithKettlewell Reading Test (SKread), IReST, Salzburg Reading Desk, Ramulu test, Radner paragraph optotypes, Balsam AlabdulkaderLeat (BAL) chart, Chinese Reading Acuity Charts (C-READ), chart for reading threshold and reading speed evaluation by T.S. Egorova. The following parameters were considered: maximum reading speed, reading threshold, reading acuity, reading accessibility index, threshold reading speed. Recovering the ability to read fluently is one of the criteria for assessing the success of treatment, as well as quality of life for patients of various age groups

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research