z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparative analysis of echocardiography, multispiral computed tomography, myocardial perfusion scintigraphy to evaluate left ventricular volume and left ventricular ejection fraction
Author(s) -
А. S. Galyavich,
Галявич Альберт Сарварович,
A Y Rafikov,
Рафиков Алексей Юрьевич,
Г. Б. Сайфуллина,
Сайфуллина Гузалия Бариевна
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
kazanskij medicinskij žurnal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2587-9359
pISSN - 0368-4814
DOI - 10.17816/kmj1767
Subject(s) - ejection fraction , medicine , nuclear medicine , single photon emission computed tomography , scintigraphy , perfusion , cardiology , end diastolic volume , multislice , radiology , stroke volume , heart failure
Aim. To perform a comparative analysis of multislice computed tomography (MSCT), echocardiography and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in the evaluation of left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LV EDV) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).Methods. The study included 44 patients (15 female, 29 male) aged of 21 to 73 years (mean age 55±11 years). LV EDV and LVEF were assessed by noninvasive MSCT coronary angiography. echocardiography and SPECT were also performed.Results. There was a statistically significant difference found between the LV EDV medians for the following pairs: MSCT vs Quantitative Gated SPECT (QGS), MSCT vs SPECT using 4D MSPECT regimen, MSCT vs echocardiography. There was no statistically significant difference determined for the following pairs: echocardiography vs SPECT, QGS SPECT vs 4D MSPECT. Difference between the LV EDV were calculated using the Bland-Altman method as following: MSCT vs echocardiography - 55±33 ml, MSCT vs QGS SPECT - 38±29 ml, MSCT vs 4D MSPECT - 30±33 ml. Differences in the LVEF evaluation methods were: MSCT vs echocardiography - 2,5±7,2%, MSCT vs QGS SPECT - 0,9±8,3%, MSCT vs 4D MSPECT - 1,2±8,1%. The highest LV EDV values were registered by MSCT, the lowest - by echocardiography, with the values registered by SPECT lying in between MSCT and echocardiography volumes.Conclusion. MSCT, echocardiography and SPECT present different left ventricular volume and similar LVEF data.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here