
Syphilis and Pyatigorsk
Author(s) -
A. Weinstein
Publication year - 1929
Publication title -
kazanskij medicinskij žurnal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2587-9359
pISSN - 0368-4814
DOI - 10.17816/kazmj78966
Subject(s) - syphilis , medicine , attendance , psychiatry , human immunodeficiency virus (hiv) , family medicine , political science , law
Chlenov (Clinical Medicine, 1928, vol. VI, No. 3) in a rather large, interesting article in detail, having analyzed all the indications and contraindications for the use of sulfur baths for syphilis, indicates that the use of such in syphilis is often problematic, not based on any what scientific findings. With extremely rare exceptions (malignant syphilis), there are no direct indications for the use of sulfur baths for syphilitics. Increased release of mercury when using sulfur baths is observed when using conventional baths. To reinforce the specific course and the general condition of the body, a syphilitic can be sent with equal success to other resorts in addition to Pyatigorsk. The problematic nature of sulfur baths in syphilis, meanwhile, has led to the fact that Pyatigorsk enjoys an undeserved syphilidological reputation among the public and doctors; they are afraid to go there, so as not to get the stigma of a syphilitic. This extremely sad fact leads to the fall of Pyatigorsk as a resort, to a decrease in its attendance, while its natural resources (sulfuric, salt, bitter waters, Tambukan mud) can serve a colossal number of a wide variety of patients.