
COMPARISON RESULTS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT LOCALIZED AND EXTENDED UTERINE CANCER
Author(s) -
И И Ушаков,
Ушаков Игорь Иванович,
E A Artoshina,
Артошина Екатерина Александровна,
P G Brousov,
П Г Брюсов,
И В Названцев,
И В Названцев,
С А Леваков,
С А Леваков,
А. Г. Кедрова,
А. Г. Кедрова
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
kliničeskaâ praktika
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2618-8627
pISSN - 2220-3095
DOI - 10.17816/clinpract1356-61
Subject(s) - medicine , palpation , lymphadenectomy , endometrial cancer , radiation therapy , hysterectomy , adjuvant radiotherapy , surgery , stage (stratigraphy) , carcinoma , primary treatment , cancer , radiology , paleontology , biology
We selected 145 patients with endometrial carcinoma who had been treated with standard surgery (hysterectomy and BSO, peritoneal washing, palpation pelvic and para-aortic nodes) and with complete systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy (n=30 patients) or combined pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (n=30). Patients at intermediate or high risk of recurrence were offered adjuvant radiotherapy. The primary outcome measure was results of the surgical therapy.