Experimental comparison of constructions «spondylosyndesis-270» and «spondylosyndesis-360»
Author(s) -
Abakirov Medetbek,
R. М. Nourmukhametov,
Ya. A. Borisov
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of clinical practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2618-8627
pISSN - 2220-3095
DOI - 10.17816/clinpract09128-34
Subject(s) - fixation (population genetics) , torsion (gastropod) , hum , orthodontics , cadaver , medicine , surgery , mathematics , nuclear medicine , population , art , environmental health , performance art , art history
Objective: The purpose of our study was to compare the biomechanical properties of the «spondylosyndesis-270» and «spondylosyndesis-360» fusion methods and make a conclusion about the possibility of the clinical use of «spondylosyndesis-270».
Mаteriаls аnd Methods. Experimentаl study included three-series tests with humаn spine cаdаver specimens. The stаbility of spinаl segments with trаnspediculаr instrumentаtion wаs studied during mechаnicаl loаd similar «in vivo» conditions. We used a torsion and tensile load on cadaver discs and investigated the stability of screw fixation in both methods.
Results: the monolateral fixation with the banana-shaped cage provides a sufficiently level of stability
under compression and torsion load. However, the outcomes of the monolateral method of fusion was better. We recommend a using of spondylodesis-270 method for surgical treatment in case of degenerative lumbar spine disease.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom